Plum student enters shoe design competition |
Valley News Dispatch

Plum student enters shoe design competition

Dillon Carr
Dillon Carr | Tribune-Review
Micah Pierce, 17, displays his shoe design for Vans that he submitted for a competition to win $25,000 and mass production of the shoe.

A Plum teen was scrolling through social media one day when he happened upon a shoe design competition that caught his eye.

Inspired, Micah Pierce, 17, entered the Vans “Custom Culture” competition in September that promises the winner $25,000 and mass production of the winning shoe design.

Pierce, a Plum Senior High School senior, now has a little more than 8,000 votes for the design he calls “Fashion Icon,” inspired partly by New York Fashion Week. His design includes colorful women’s products such as clothing, makeup and jewelry.

He hopes to get about 12,000 additional votes before Sunday so he can be one of the top 10 vote-getters. That would qualify his design for the next round: being paired with a Vans design mentor to create the final shoe design.

Judges will choose three favorite shoe designs in December based on creativity, originality and overall execution.

As of Oct. 10, a shoe with illustrated animals and the words “End Speciesism Until All Are Free” had the most votes with nearly 38,000.

The National Honor Society student is excited about the competition, which he sees as a boost to a budding career in art. Pierce also draws superhero cartoons and comic book illustrations.

He said his design took a couple of weeks to draw on paper and digitize before submitting it to Vans.

“I wanted to create a shoe for girls,” he said. “I thought it would be fun.”

He also aspires to creating his own comic book brand, a video game series and animated movies.

Should Pierce win, he would give his earnings to his mom, who was another source of inspiration for his “Fashion Icon” shoe design.

To vote for Pierce’s shoe, go online.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.