Police arrest man who claimed to see cougars in Vandergrift | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Police arrest man who claimed to see cougars in Vandergrift

Chuck Biedka
1386620_web1_Handcuffs

A man is awaiting a preliminary hearing after he claimed to see two cougars nearby and then jumped over a lawn chair and charged police in Vandergrift.

Police are accusing Justin John Crofutt, 37, of Ford City, of aggravated assault on an officer, resisting arrest and being under the influence during the incident on July 2. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for July 16.

According to an affidavit, police were sent to the Popular Street area of Vandergrift for a man who neighbors said appeared under the influence and “acting strange.” The affidavit did not state whether police believed Crofutt was under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

When police arrive, they ask Crofutt what was happening and, according to the affidavit, he replied that he was seeing two cougars.

An officer asked him to walk toward police.

That’s when, police say, Crofutt hurdled a lawn chair and ran at officers.

In response, an officer touched a Taser to Crofutt’s abdomen.

Police say Crofutt fell to the ground but soon started to roll over despite being told to stay on his stomach on the ground. When Crofutt started to get up, the same officer touched him with a Taser for 5 seconds, according to police.

Crofutt was arrested and handcuffed but resisted getting inside the police car, according to the arresting officer.

Crofutt was about half way into the car when he started to kick. An officer’s hand was injured, police said.

Details were not available from police if the officer was seriously injured.

A defense attorney is not yet listed on state court records for Crofutt.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.