Police: Brackenridge man chased man with baseball bat, mooned him | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Police: Brackenridge man chased man with baseball bat, mooned him

Madasyn Czebiniak
1098879_web1_police-lights

A Brackenridge man is accused of yelling racial slurs at another man before chasing him with a baseball bat and mooning him.

The alleged victim told authorities he was walking past the home of Eric Todd Clark, 47, on April 26 when Clark called him a racial slur, Brackenridge police say. The alleged victim yelled back at Clark and began to record him on his cellphone, according to court papers filed in the case.

As the man was recording, police said, Clark grabbed an aluminum bat and started to chase him across an empty parking lot.

Clark turned his back to the other man, pulled down his pants and mooned him, police said, after which he pulled up his pants and ran toward the victim again, with the bat raised. The alleged victim stopped recording and ran away.

Clark was told that day that he wasn’t to have any more contact with the alleged victim, but Clark contacted him through Facebook Messenger a few days later, police said.

Police this week issued a warrant for Clark’s arrest. He had not been arrested as of Wednesday afternoon.

Clark faces misdemeanor charges of terroristic threats, ethnic intimidation, simple assault, harassment and open lewdness as well as summary charges of harassment and disorderly conduct.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.