Residential development tentatively approved near Beechwood Farms | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Residential development tentatively approved near Beechwood Farms

1394206_web1_her-ind-062019
file

Indiana Township supervisors on Tuesday night tentatively approved The Waters, a planned residential development (PRD) less than a half-mile west of Fairview Elementary School on Dorseyville Road.

By a 3-2 vote, the board gave first-round approval of The Waters Senior Living Holdings, with the stipulation that additional traffic/parking studies can be mandated if necessary.

The multi-family housing development will include one three-story building with 179 units and 14 ‘cottages,’ each with two units.

The 23-acre site, just down the road from Beechwood Farms Nature Reserve, will also include a memory-care unit.

Development spokesman Kevin McKeegan said the project may offer assisted living or other senior services as well.

The state requires licensing for many of these services.

Supervisors Paul Jorgensen and Dan Taylor voted against the proposal.

Jorgensen said he was concerned the PRD moniker was a “backdoor” to getting approval for the plan.

Taylor agreed, saying his understanding of PRD regulations is planning for family homes.

He argued these are not individual residences. Some of the units in the 40.5-foot-tall building will have kitchenettes designed for snacking or room service but residents will go to a communal dining room.

He also argued that personal care homes are a permitted use in the township’s commercial district and that PRD’s are for residential buildings, as the name implies.

Letting a commercial or industrial use in a PRD zone would set a precedent that would “open the door in the future,” Taylor said.

He was concerned about the height of the large building which will have multiple wings.

Taylor, who represents District 4 near Middle Road, said the three-story building should “harmonize” with surroundings but that The Waters will be surrounded by single-family dwellings primarily.

Developers said they plan to increase the project buffer zone from the required 25 feet to 75 feet.

They will have rain gardens and six water detention facilities, and a walking trail will be retained.

Eleven trees will be cut and 470 replanted.

About eight audience members were there during the discussions and vote. No one spoke publicly for or against the construction.

Plans call for maintaining trails used by visitors of nearby Beechwood Farms and developers said they would offer parking places near their entrance for the nature

reserve’s overflow.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.