Social media comment by Deer Lakes student not a threat against district, officials say | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Social media comment by Deer Lakes student not a threat against district, officials say

Michael DiVittorio
1715960_web1_web-deerlakessign

A threat made by a Deer Lakes High School student on social media was determined to be not credible, officials said Monday.

West Deer police are investigating after they said a student said via Snapchat, “Who should I shoot first?”

West Deer Sgt. Mike Shurina said Monday a resident told police about the threat Sunday. Officers went to the juvenile’s home and spoke with the student and parents.

“It raised a red flag for us to investigate,” Shurina said. “It was found that there was no actual intent to carry out the threat, or means to carry out the threat.”

The incident is still under investigation. So far, no charges have been filed.

“At this time we have no reason to believe the threat was credible,” said district Superintendent Janell Logue-Belden said in a statement on Monday.

The statement also said the student stayed home from school on Monday “out of an abundance of caution.”

Spokesman James Cromie also released a statement Monday night.

He said the district was made aware of the threat Monday morning, and noted the boy’s post did not mention anyone in particular or where any potential violence might happen.

“We know that school violence is a concern for anyone who has loved ones attending or working in our schools,” Cromie said. “For that reason we have a responsibility to make sure we have all of our facts straight before ringing the alarm bell because once it is sounded, it cannot be un-rung.”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.