Some Washington Township residents could get hit with stormwater fees |
Valley News Dispatch

Some Washington Township residents could get hit with stormwater fees

Mary Ann Thomas
Patrick Varine | Tribune-Review
The Municipal Authority of Washington Township will have jurisdiction over new stormwater retention ponds for pollution control. Here is a pond in Murrysville where authorities are working to reduce stormwater-related pollution.

Washington Township supervisors expanded the powers of the Municipal Authority of Washington Township to handle stormwater projects.

While the authority has jurisdiction over sewage issues, supervisors voted unanimously last week to allow the authority to also deal with stormwater projects.

The township is making the change as part of an effort to comply with state and federal environmental requirements to decrease pollution into local waterways.

Washington Township’s focus is on decreasing the amount of silt entering local streams and taking over jurisdiction of stormwater drainage ponds for developments in the township.

Proposed stormwater detention ponds for future development will be reviewed for possible ownership and maintenance by the township.

Residents in those new developments will likely pay a small stormwater fee instead of spreading the cost to the rest of the township’s residents, according to Supervisors Chairman Rich Gardner.

Such ponds can have maintenance issues. For example, in Murrysville, authorities are working on ponds to slow the release of stormwater into the environment.

Other stormwater retention ponds in the township will remain privately owned for the time being.

The state Department of Environmental Protection is requiring Washington Township and other municipalities with a separate storm sewer system to develop a plan to reduce pollution in state waters.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.