Springdale questions contractor’s work on paving project | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Springdale questions contractor’s work on paving project

Emily Balser

Springdale borough officials and some residents are unhappy with the job Tresco Paving has done on James Street.

As a result, Springdale Council voted 7-0 last week to withhold 10% of the payment to Tresco — about $10,200 — until borough officials can meet with the company to iron out problems.

“Residents have waited so long for this (paving) and have been through holy heck,” Borough Manager Kim McAfoose said.

Complaints cited at a council meeting included drainage problems and pavers covering a valve box.

Street foreman Carmen Canonico said the area of James Street between Willow and Marion streets is particularly troublesome to him.

“Springdale residents deserve better,” Canonico said. “Why should we pay for shoddy work?”

Vince Tresco, vice president of Tresco Paving, said the problems cited aren’t issues and it wasn’t unusual that the borough opted to temporarily withhold payment.

“That’s just standard stuff,” he said.

Tresco said the company has been in contact with Springdale officials and is waiting for further directions on what needs to be done.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.