ShareThis Page
Springdale Manor resident caused fire after falling asleep while smoking | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Springdale Manor resident caused fire after falling asleep while smoking

Chuck Biedka
932005_web1_vnd-springfire-032619
A resident of the Springdale Manor high-rise fell asleep while smoking and caused a small fire in his apartment on Monday, March 25, 2019.

A resident of the Springdale Manor high-rise fell asleep while smoking and caused a small fire in his apartment Monday morning, officials said.

“Fortunately, the smoke detector woke him up and he dumped water on the fire in the carpet,” said Allegheny County Housing Authority police Sgt. Ed Mogus.

Had the smoke detector not roused the resident, Mogus said, “We might have had a tragedy.”

Raising the potential for danger: Mogus said the man uses an oxygen tank to help him breathe, and smoking around the tanks is an explosion hazard.

The fire started just after 9 a.m. at the eight-story, 90-apartment building on Pittsburgh Street.

Authority police Chief Mike Vogel said no other apartments were damaged, and authorities did not evacuate the building.

The authority, which manages the property, could take steps to remove the resident because smoking isn’t allowed in the building and the ban is spelled out in residents’ leases, according to Vogel. The authority’s website said all authority properties became smoke-free in February 2017. The resident was not identified.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, cbiedka@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.