Springdale Township officials satisfied with fledgling police merger | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Springdale Township officials satisfied with fledgling police merger


Like their neighbors in Cheswick, Springdale Township officials are happy with the early weeks of the merger of their police departments.

On July 1, Cheswick and Springdale Township consolidated police services into the Allegheny Valley Regional Police Department.

A steering committee made up of representatives from both municipalities manages the department.

“It appears to be working out,” commissioners Chairman Tony Rozzano said. “We just have to work out the bugs.”

One item that needs ironed out is hiring police and security for special events, such as a recent concert at Williams Street Park.

The township had to hire a security officer since the steering committee controls the scheduling. A constable was present at Thursday’s commissioners meeting. In the past, a township police officer was stationed at the meeting.

Solicitor Craig Alexander told residents that the steering committee will have to figure out some policies “since we no longer have a police department.”

Security officers and constables will be paid $30 per hour until an agreement is worked out for off-duty officers.

“They’re working out some issues,” Commissioner Henrietta James said. “I’ve been to a couple of (steering committee) meetings and they’ve been great.”

James is not a committee member.

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.