Tarentum considering regulations governing solar panels | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Tarentum considering regulations governing solar panels

Brian C. Rittmeyer

Tarentum is considering regulations that would govern the installation and use of solar panels in the borough.

The proposed ordinance includes proposed fees and technical requirements for what are broadly referred to as “customer-owned generation of electricity,” which could include things besides solar panels, such as windmills.

Tarentum operates its own electric distribution utility. It buys electricity from a supplier.

The need for the proposed regulations came up after there had been a couple of inquiries from residents, borough Manager Michael Nestico said. It is based on those from another public power municipality like Tarentum.

Residents who generate enough electricity with their own equipment could get a credit on their electric bill, Nestico said.

Fees under the 17-page ordinance include a $300 application fee, a $150 initial inspection fee and a $150 annual inspection fee.

Customers would be responsible for the costs of all system studies and upgrades required to accommodate generation, including metering. Customers would be responsible for annual system testing witnessed by borough representatives.

Those who violate the ordinance could face a fine of between $300 and $1,000.

The proposed ordinance is available for inspection and copy at the borough office, 318 Second Ave.

Council could vote to enact the ordinance when it meets at 6 p.m. Thursday, March 7.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.