Tarentum homeowner worries about repairing house after fallen tree removed | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Tarentum homeowner worries about repairing house after fallen tree removed

Brian C. Rittmeyer
754196_web1_VND-TarentumTree4-021419
Tarentum resident Frank Lee, of 400 Allegheny St., assess the damage to his home after a large Buck Eye tree fell Wednesday morning, Feb. 13, 2019.
754196_web1_vnd-leetree-021619
Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
A tree that fell on a home on Allegheny Street in Tarentum the morning of Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2019 had been removed by Friday morning, Feb. 15, 2019.

The extent of the damage caused to a Tarentum home when a tree fell on it Wednesday was more apparent Friday after the tree had been removed.

The buckeye tree that fell on Frank Lee’s house at 400 Allegheny St. was removed Thursday afternoon, Lee said.

Lee was back in his house, despite the extensive damage that had been done to the roof. The hole in the roof was covered so rain doesn’t get inside and cause further damage.

“I had to get it off of my house,” Lee said of the tree. “That was a lot of weight on the house.”

Borough officials had advised Lee to not stay in the house Wednesday night when the tree was still resting against it. Code Enforcement Officer Anthony Bruni said he inspected the house Friday morning and approved temporary occupancy for Lee.

“I believe there is less of a threat now that the tree is not resting on the house,” Bruni said Friday morning.

Lee said he’s expecting an adjuster from his insurance company Monday.

“I might not have enough coverage to cover the damages,” he said. ‘Then what do I do?”

The tree had been standing at the front of a vacant lot next to Lee’s house. The lot has been owned since 2011 by Donald and Leslie Yoest and Matthew and Holly Plocki, according to Allegheny County real estate records.

Matthew Plocki and Donald Yoest are co-owners of Pitt Specialty Supply, located across the street along Fourth Avenue.

Yoest said they had no comment when reached in person at the business.

Lee said the tree service told him the tree that fell was rotted and had bees nests in it, and he was informed a nearby tree still standing is also rotted.

Lee reported that someone from Pitt Specialty Supply came to him the day the tree fell and said they would not be paying for any of the damage, claiming they had wanted to take the tree down but were prevented from doing so because the tree was somehow protected.

The company representative claimed to have a letter to that effect, but both Lee and Bruni said Pitt Specialty has not produced it.

Bruni said he checked with a state forester with the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, who had “no indication that buckeye trees are on an endangered list or protected status.”

Jeff Woleslagle, a Pennsylvania Bureau of Forestry spokesman, said the buckeye is not listed as rare, threatened or endangered in the state.

“We do not send letters out like that to inform people they can’t remove a tree,” he said.

Lauren Fraley, a spokeswoman with the state Department of Environmental Protection, said the tree would not be an issue for that agency.

Allegheny County spokeswoman Amie Downs said she was not aware of anything at the county level that would have prevented the tree’s removal.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.