ShareThis Page
New Kensington-Arnold district, teachers’ union making progress on contract | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

New Kensington-Arnold district, teachers’ union making progress on contract

Tom Davidson
741468_web1_vnd-NewKenArnold-021319
New Kensington-Arnold School District

More than 18 months after their last teachers’ contract expired, negotiators in New Kensington-Arnold School District may be closing in on a new labor pact.

Officials from both the teachers’ union and the district say they are making progress in resolving their differences.

“We’ve been working without a contract for 529 days,” said Phil Cope, a spokesman for the 162-member New Kensington-Arnold Education Association.

Teachers are working under the terms of a contract that expired Aug. 31, 2017. Negotiations for a new agreement started the January before it expired and have continued with little progress.

The latest school board meeting was packed with teachers who came out in force to raise awareness about the stalemate.

“When our contract expired… we did not expect to continue to be without a contract for over 18 months. This has been a difficult situation for our members, who are professional educators that continue to provide the high quality of service that the taxpayers in this community deserve.”

It’s those taxpayers the district is trying to best serve, Superintendent John Pallone said.

“We pinch pennies where we can… it’s expensive to run a school,” Pallone said. “The lion’s share of our budget is wages and benefits. We only have so many dollars in the pot.”

It’s challenging because the cost of everything increases each year and the district is trying to negotiate a contract it can afford, Pallone said.

“We continue to meet and we’re hopeful we can come to an agreement,” he said. “We’re hopeful that everyone can put their reasonable glasses on and come up with a fair and equitable resolution.”

Negotiations held Friday evening have both sides optimistic.

“Our negotiations team feels that discussions on Friday succeeded in overcoming some significant hurdles which have prevented our two sides from reaching agreement,” said Cope, who tempered his optimism by pointing out that negotiators still have some details to work out.

Neither side would publicly detail the sticking points.

“We are confident that the school board understands the urgency of the situation and, with any luck, we will reach agreement on a successor contract in the very near future,” Cope said.

The next negotiations are slated for Feb. 27.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.