Virginia men accused of stealing items worth $6K from Walmart |
Valley News Dispatch

Virginia men accused of stealing items worth $6K from Walmart

Madasyn Czebiniak
From left: Shawn Terrance Acklin, 27; Adarrus DePriest Ferguson, 27; and Brandon Laroy Franklin, 23, are accused of stealing more than $6,000 worth of merchandise from an Armstrong County Walmart.

Three Virginia men are accused of stealing more than $6,000 worth of merchandise from an Armstrong County Walmart and are suspected in similar thefts at other Walmarts and stores in at least two other states.

State Police in Kittanning filed felony theft charges Friday against Shawn Terrance Acklin, 27; Adarrus DePriest Ferguson, 27, and Brandon Laroy Franklin, 23. All three are from Norfolk, Va.

“They were doing this at multiple Walmarts across the east coast,” state police Cpl. Curtis Guntrum said Friday afternoon. “They also have charges out of Maryland that they have to respond to.”

The men also were arrested on similar charges Feb. 4 in Luray, Va., according to police. Guntrum said they are in jail in Virginia.

A phone message left with the Luray Police Department wasn’t returned Friday.

Troopers said the three men, along with another unidentified man, went to the Walmart store in East Franklin, Armstrong County, on Jan. 26.

They allegedly grabbed carts and filled them with various high-price items, such as robot vacuum cleaners, routers and other electronics.

According to troopers, the men allegedly stole $4,000 to $6,000 worth of items from other Walmarts and stores across Western Pennsylvania.

In Armstrong County, the men face charges of organized retail theft and retail theft.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.