Two accused of taking broken Leechburg parking meter |
Valley News Dispatch

Two accused of taking broken Leechburg parking meter

Chuck Biedka

Two Leechburg residents are charged with taking a borough parking meter because, as one said, it would be “cool to have.”

Lynzi Wolfe, 31, and John Edward Johnston Jr., 27, sre accused of taking the meter on May 7.

According to court papers, the meter is worth about $140. It’s unclear whether there was money inside.

Police say a store owner’s surveillance cameras show a man and woman removing the broken meter and putting it near a Third Street dumpster, where it was later retrieved.

Police accuse Wolfe and Johnston of getting the meter and taking it to Wolfe’s residence.

The two are charged of theft, receiving stolen property and two counts of criminal mischief.

Preliminary hearings are scheduled July 3 before District Judge James Andring.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.