2 Harrison girls facing juvenile arson charges stemming from Save-A-Lot fire | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

2 Harrison girls facing juvenile arson charges stemming from Save-A-Lot fire

Chuck Biedka
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Firefighters quickly put out a fire on the loading dock of the former Save-A-Lot store in Harrsion on Sept. 2.

Two Harrison girls will be sent to juvenile court for allegedly setting part of a Harrison loading dock on fire Sept. 2.

The girls, ages 12 and 13, caused less than $1,000 in damage to a rear loading dock of the former Save-A-Lot in Heights Plaza.

Citizens Hose Fire Chief Sean Jones said Wednesday the fire was limited to the dock’s rubber bumpers. The flames didn’t get into the building, although there was some smoke damage.

He said a state fire marshal interviewed the girls, who are not being identified because of their age.

Harrison police Chief Mike Klein said Wednesday the girls are facing juvenile charges of arson and causing criminal damage.

Firefighters from Harrison, Tarentum and Lower Burrell responded to the blaze.

Jones said the fire was under control in about 20 minutes thanks to the quick work of staff from the nearby Big Lots and township police. Jones said they were using fire extinguishers until firefighters arrived.

One firefighter was treated at the scene for a cut on their head . He hit his head inside a fire truck when it struck a pothole at the scene. No one was injured as a result of the fire.

The building was being used to store Harrison Township’s Christmas decorations. Those items were not damaged.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.