2 Philly men indicted for having $10 million of cocaine | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

2 Philly men indicted for having $10 million of cocaine

Chuck Biedka
1142799_web1_ptr-cocainebust-022619
Police seized 23 kilograms of cocaine with an estimated street value of $10 million while executing arrest warrants against two Philadelphia men in North Braddock on Monday, Feb. 25, 2019.

Two Philadelphia men arrested in North Braddock in February for allegedly having about $10 million worth of cocaine are now facing federal drug charges, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Pittsburgh.

Jermaine Kyle Clark, 41, and Terry Suggs, Jr., 34, are named in a three-count indictment handed down Wednesday but not made public until Friday by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh.

The men are accused of distributing cocaine and methamphetamine, the office’s website reports.

On Feb. 29, the Allegheny County District Attorney Narcotics Enforcement Team conducted a controlled drug buy.

Officials said Clark and Suggs were found with 23 vacuum-sealed packages containing about 23 kilograms of cocaine.

They say the drugs were found inside hidden compartments in vehicles driven by the men.

Police also found $8,000 in the vehicle driven by Suggs.

The drug team started the investigation last summer.

In February, the Allegheny County District Attorney Office spokesman called Clark the “head of the trafficking organization” and named Suggs Jr. as a co-conspirator.

If convicted, the law provides for a sentence of at least 10 years up to life in prison.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebecca L. Silinski is prosecuting this case.

The county drug team made the initial arrests the FBI conducted the follow-up investigation.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.