Upper Burrell temporarily shelves fire-tax proposal | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Upper Burrell temporarily shelves fire-tax proposal

Mary Ann Thomas
Upper Burrell’s volunteer fire department is in need of a new truck. Here is an outdated 1997 truck that the department would like to retire.

Upper Burrell Supervisors will temporarily shelve a proposal for a 2-mill fire tax as they further study the finances of the township’s volunteer fire company, according to Supervisors Chairman Ross Walker.

In April, the board directed its solicitor to draw up a resolution for a 2-mill fire tax to pay for a new fire truck, which is expected to cost about $800,000.

The average homeowner would pay about $40 extra a year in township real estate taxes, according to Walker.

The volunteer fire department currently receives about $35,000 a year from the township’s local service tax, $20,000 from the general budget and insurance coverage for its vehicles.

“There’s no doubt that they need the equipment and a new truck,” Walker said. “We have to re-examine how much they are getting and how much more we will be adding to it.”

If supervisors approve the tax, it would be incorporated into the township’s budget for 2020.

Supervisors might revisit discussion of the fire tax as early as their next regular meeting at 7 p.m. June 5 in the township building at 3735 Seventh Street Rd.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.