Vandergrift finally gets to move on its 2018 paving projects |
Valley News Dispatch

Vandergrift finally gets to move on its 2018 paving projects

George Guido

Although the calendar says 2019, Vandergrift is still working on its 2018 paving program.

Money from the federal Community Development Block Grant program didn’t arrive until mid-November, after the hot asphalt facilities closed for the winter.

The borough will seek new contract bids on paving and, if Punxsutawney Phil is right and spring comes early, the borough would want to start paving as soon as possible.

Here are the streets on the paving list:

  • Hawthorne Street from Longfellow Street to 28th Street;
  • 34th Street from Bryant Street to 29th Street and from Wallace Street to Hancock Avenue;
  • 27th Street from Hancock to Longfellow;
  • 26th Street from Hawthorne to Wallace;
  • Bryant from Hancock to Poe Street;
  • Poe from Bryant to Holmes;
  • Longfellow Street Ext. from Longfellow to house No. 807;
  • Whittier Street from Wallace to Howell Street.

The Oregon Avenue paving project is on hold for now because the borough is waiting for approval on issues such as environmental impact.

Bid will be sought separately for Oregon once approvals are granted.

Officials from the borough and from Peoples Natural Gas will meet on Wednesday to coordinate paving work with pipeline replacements in order to avoid having the gas company dig up a freshly-paved street.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

George Guido is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.