Vandergrift man accused of kidnapping baby in Arnold |
Valley News Dispatch

Vandergrift man accused of kidnapping baby in Arnold

Madasyn Czebiniak

A Vandergrift man is accused of beating up a woman and kidnapping her baby Saturday in Arnold.

Police arrested Jusu Jeovainni Kanneh Jr., 30, of Grant Street at his home after the woman accused him of assaulting her and taking her 4-month-old son from her when she arrived at her cousin’s house along Victoria Avenue.

The woman told Arnold police that Kanneh began screaming at her and pulling her out of her vehicle, according to the criminal complaint filed in the case. He also slammed the door against her head.

After Kanneh pulled the woman from the vehicle, he took the car seat with her baby in it and drove away, the woman told police. She said Kanneh lives in Vandergrift and was most likely headed back there, according to the complaint.

The woman had a large red welt and swelling around and above her left eye and multiple red marks and bruising on her left arm, according to the complaint. A witness confirmed the incident, police said.

Vandergrift police took both the child and Kanneh into custody at Kanneh’s residence. Kanneh is not the father of the child, according to the complaint. Police did not say where the child was taken.

Kanneh was released on a $25,000 unsecured bond after arraignment. No attorney is listed for him in court records.

He is charged with kidnapping and simple assault. A preliminary hearing is set for May 30.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.