Vandergrift officials pondering options for abandoned structure |
Valley News Dispatch

Vandergrift officials pondering options for abandoned structure


Officials in Vandergrift are looking to Westmoreland County to begin the process of getting rid of a deteriorated structure.

On Monday, Melissa Adams, who lives near the deteriorated property at 113 East Adams Ave., asked council if there is something more that can be done about it.

She said although it is roped off with yellow caution tape, young people are ignoring it and going inside. She is concerned someone might get hurt.

Solicitor Larry Loperfito said it’s difficult for the borough to act unilaterally on a property that is privately owned — even when it is abandoned.

“The problem is it’s a property, and somebody else owns it, not the borough,” he said, adding that in Pennsylvania, property rights reign supreme.

“We know there are heirs (to the property), but they just walked away,” Loperfito said.

He said the heirs live out of state in the southern U.S. and the estate, of which the property is part, is being handled by an attorney in Virginia. Loperfito said he has contacted the attorney regarding the property but that person has refused to respond.

Loperfito said he will contact county officials to see if they can do anything about expediting the placement of property on the next judicial tax sale list for nonpayment of taxes. He said that would be the first step.

Meanwhile, he suggested that the borough engineer, Lucien Bove, examine the property.

He said while the borough is limited in what it can do, the borough does have greater power if a structure constitutes a public safety hazard.

“If Lucien takes a look at it and says, ‘This thing is going to collapse,’ then the borough might have to take emergency action,” Loperfito said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.