West Deer family displaced by fire | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

West Deer family displaced by fire

Michael DiVittorio
1936709_web1_Police-lights

Members of a West Deer family discovered their house was on fire Tuesday night when the lights snapped off and they went to investigate, according to a township fire chief.

“It probably was the fire burning some of the circuits,” said West Deer No. 3 Fire Chief Josh Wiegand.

The fire was reported shortly after 8 p.m. at 4365 Bakerstown Culmerville Road.

Two adults, a child and a dog and cat got out of the three-story, wood-framed house safely, but two other cats were missing, officials said.

The fire presented challenges for responding firefighters.

“The roof collapsed soon after we arrived and there was significant water damage to the house,” he said.

Crews also had to battle frigid temperatures in the high teens to low 20s and slick road conditions.

“The extreme cold temperatures (made it) difficult to keep the firefighters warm,” Wiegand said.

No injuries were reported, according to emergency dispatchers.

Emergency responders cleared the scene around 11:20 p.m. A damage estimate was not available Wednesday, but Wiegand said the family had insurance.

The Allegheny County Fire Marshal’s office is investigating.

Red Cross spokesperson Lisa Landis said the organization was dispatched to help the residents. It was unknown Wednesday where they were staying.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.