West Deer, Fawn to receive $100,000 each for Bairdford Park, road improvement projects | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

West Deer, Fawn to receive $100,000 each for Bairdford Park, road improvement projects

Madasyn Lee
1937324_web1_web-westdeer

Two Alle-Kiski Valley townships have been awarded $100,000 in state funding for improvement projects.

The money for West Deer and Fawn comes from Allegheny County’s Gaming Economic Development Fund Grant. The program is funded through gambling revenues and doesn’t use money from the state general fund money.

West Deer’s money will pay for improvements to Bairdford Park, including the wall behind the baseball fields, stormwater improvements, installation of security cameras and pavilion renovations.

Fawn will use the money to reconstruct Metz Road from Bull Creek Road to Ridge Road. Crews will be replacing 350 feet of guardrail.

State Rep. Bob Brooks, R-Murrysville, who represents the 54th Legislative District, advocated for the grants.

“I’m happy GEDF recognized the value in these projects,” Brooks said. “The Fawn Township project will improve our roadways and help to remediate flood waters and landslides.

“The West Deer Township project will enhance outdoor recreation opportunities. With improved roads and park renovations, it will help to boost the economy by bringing residents of neighboring communities into the area.”

In the Alle-Kiski Valley, the state 54th House District includes Allegheny Township, Fawn, Harrison, Lower Burrell, Upper Burrell and West Deer. It also includes Murrysville, Export and Penn Township in Westmoreland County.

Madasyn Lee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at [email protected], 724-226-4702 or via Twitter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.