West Leechburg man accused of bank robbery waives charges to court | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

West Leechburg man accused of bank robbery waives charges to court

Chuck Biedka
Chuck Biedka | Tribune-Review
Carlin Mitchell Quinn waits to get inside a car with Leechburg Patrolman Mark Pollick on Wednesday after he waived bank robbery charges to court.

Leechburg police say that when Carlin Mitchell Quinn allegedly dug through two building walls to rob a bank, he made off with — change.

No bills, about $1,400 in coins.

“That’s my understanding,” Patrolman Mark Pollick said.

Quinn, 27 of West Leechburg, is charged with robbing the Leechburg First Commonwealth Bank branch the early morning hours of Jan. 8, 2018.

Police say Quinn entered a vacant apartment next door to the bank and tunneled through two walls to get into the bank next door.

On Wednesday, Quinn waived charges to Armstrong County Court.

Neither Quinn nor his public defender commented at the hearing.

“He didn’t talk with me when I charged him, and he hasn’t spoken since,” Pollick said of Quinn.

According to Quinn’s arrest papers, the hole dug into in the bank’s wall led into the bank manager’s office.

To get there, police say Quinn broke into a vacant apartment next to the bank through a back door, crossed through a small courtyard and then broken a hole in the bank’s wall. The only money the robber got was taken from coin vaults behind several bank tellers’ counters, according to arrest papers.

Pollick said he found gloves and an insulated foam cup inside the bank that didn’t belong there.

State police sent them to an FBI lab. Police say that testing found DNA found on the three items matched Quinn’s DNA.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.