Western Pa. soccer coaches split on U.S. women running up score in World Cup | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Western Pa. soccer coaches split on U.S. women running up score in World Cup

Paul Guggenheimer
U.S. forward Alex Morgan (left) passes as Thailand’s Kanjanaporn Saenkhun defends during a Women’s World Cup Group F match June 11, 2019, at the Auguste-Delaune Stadium in Reims, eastern France. Morgan scored five goals in a 13-0 victory.
AP Photo
United States women’s national soccer team head coach Jill Ellis smiles during a soccer workout at Red Bull Arena, Saturday, May 25, 2019, in Harrison, N.J. The U.S. will play against Mexico in an international soccer friendly on Sunday. (AP Photo/Steve Luciano)

Athletes in all sports at all levels are told to play hard and not give up.

In 1969, the Minnesota Vikings football team had a famous rallying cry of “40 for 60” which meant 40 men playing together for 60 minutes.

It got the Vikings to the Super Bowl that year.

But 50 years later, in 2019, 23 women playing together for 90 minutes are at the center of a debate about sportswomanship.

“My heart and my soul tells me that that was the wrong thing to do,” Deer Lakes High School girls soccer coach Frank Acetta said about the final score of the U.S. women’s national team opening game in the World Cup.

On Tuesday, U.S. women, the defending champs, played Thailand. It was expected to be a blow out, but few had predicted just how lopsided the game would be. The U.S. defeated Thailand 13-0, breaking the record for goals and margin of victory in a World Cup game. The U.S. scored 10 goals in the second half.

The number of goals scored matter in the World Cup as they can be used as a tiebreaker to determine the knock-out stage of the tournament. But was it classy for U.S. coach Jill Ellis to run up the score and leave star players in the game like Alex Morgan who racked up a tournament-record-tying five goals?

Acetta said he tried to stand in Ellis’ shoes, or cleats, and couldn’t imagine doing that.

“When a game is over and another team is looking at the scoreboard and sees that they lost 13-0, how good are they going to feel about themselves? The other team is just hurting,” Acetta said. “I don’t know about these women from Thailand, but it’s got to be difficult for them and that’s, for me, a reason that I couldn’t do that. I figure if you’re the best team you’re going to win the thing regardless of whether or not you come in first or second place in your division.”

Pine-Richland High School girls soccer coach Jodi Chmielewski said the World Cup is the highest level of play, so it’s the responsibility of the U.S. opponents to be prepared to play at that level.

“Thailand accepted that bid, and I don’t think it’s fair for the U.S. to have to back off. I think a lot of times it’s more disrespectful to the opponents to play keep away or try not to score. So, I didn’t find it disrespectful by the U.S.,” said Chmielewski. “I think they’re professionals and their job is to win that game and for all those players getting that chance to play in this World Cup, they want their opportunities to play as they would in any other game.”

Another criticism that some fans and analysts had for the U.S. women was that they continued to hold exuberant goal celebrations even as the lead stretched into the double digits. John Scifo, head coach of the Woodland Hills Youth Soccer Association Under-19 club team, said he doesn’t find that criticism to be entirely fair.

“The only ones I would possibly be critical of are the ones who have been there before. If they have been there and scored in the World Cup and played at that level, they won the World Cup, then okay yeah maybe,” said Scifo. “But four of them scored their first World Cup goals yesterday, and they should celebrate. I saw some other comments that if they were just nonchalant about it, people would have criticized them for that too. So you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t.”

The next scheduled match for the U.S. at the World Cup is Sunday against Chile. It figures to be, at least on paper, a much closer game.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.