ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Freeport residents asked to weigh in on plan for $11.6 million sewage plant

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2017, 12:31 a.m.

Freeport Council has decided what it thinks should be done about the borough's sewage treatment plant. Now, it's time to hear from residents.

A 30-day public comment period starts today on the borough's plans to build a new plant.

Residents have until Nov. 3 to submit questions and comments in writing to the borough office.

A public meeting on the project is still planned, but has not yet been scheduled.

A new treatment plant is expected to cost about $11.6 million.

In a worst-case scenario, officials have said residents would have to pay $79 per month to pay for it, on top of their existing $33 monthly fee.

Building a new plant was chosen over tying into the Upper Allegheny Valley Joint Sanitary Authority's system.

A study found little difference in cost to residents, at the expense of the borough no longer having its own treatment plant.

Council President Rich Hastings Jr. said officials are looking for comments on the borough's plans.

“I'm looking to see who's in support of this and who's not in support of it,” Hastings said. “I've had mixed reviews from citizens. Some say they want to keep a plant in town; others say we can't afford it and to find cheaper options.

“I'm curious how many citizens are on each side,” he said.

Hastings cautioned that the sewage facilities plan is a lengthy, “tough” read to get through. But “it explains what's going on,” he said. “It will explain to them what we're doing if they haven't been paying attention.”

The project is tentatively scheduled to be completed in 2024.

The borough will be seeking grants and low-interest loans. How much it will ultimately cost residents will depend on the actual cost and how successful the borough is at obtaining grants.

“We're going to try our hardest to get as many grants as we can for this,” Hastings said. “We all understand a $79 increase is not beneficial to anyone in town.”

Officials will have to answer residents' comments, which will be included in the plan sent to the state Department of Environmental Protection for review, said Brian Churilla, vice president of KLH Engineers, the engineering firm on the project.

The plant is still in the planning phase, Churilla said. The borough will submit its plans to the DEP by the beginning of December.

If the DEP approves, it would then move into design.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, or viaTwitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me