ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Tarentum ordinance could target business code violations

Madasyn Czebiniak
| Thursday, Oct. 5, 2017, 5:09 p.m.
Tarentum, Pa.
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
Tarentum, Pa.

Code violations continue to be a hot button issue in Tarentum.

Earlier this year, the borough introduced a new code enforcement initiative called “ Sweeps ,” where police officers make rounds throughout the borough to address code violations like high grass and garbage.

Now, council is looking to adopt an ordinance that would force borough businesses to clean up their properties or risk losing their business privilege license.

Council Vice President Erika Josefoski introduced the proposal during a recent council meeting.

It says: “Any business within the Borough of Tarentum who receives a violation warning(s) and fails to make the corrections within 10 days, will have their business privilege license revoked until the corrections are complete.”

Code enforcement Officer Chris Fabec said there are businesses along East Fourth and Fifth avenues that aren't maintaining their properties.

“One of them has apartments upstairs, and they take their garbage and they throw it out back,” Fabec said. “It's there for two weeks because they don't use our trash, they have their own. They don't clean it up.”

Fabec said he has cited those businesses, but that hasn't been working.

He said an ordinance would have “more backbone” to it than continuous citations because it would force business owners to fix code issues if they want to stay open.

“If they don't want to maintain, then they shouldn't have a license to operate,” Fabec said.

Solicitor David Regoli said he has to research what council is able to do legally.

“Anytime you want to go in and you want to revoke a license you have to make sure that the businesses have an opportunity to be heard and present a defense,” Regoli said. “I have to look and make sure that anything I do (won't) infringe on their rights.”

Gatto Cycle Shop President George Gatto said he likes the proposed ordinance, but disagrees with the time frame. He said he doesn't think 10 days is enough time for businesses to address code violations.

“If I had to get an electrician to fix a wire, if I had to get something on the roof fixed, it's going to take more than 10 days to get it done,” Gatto said. “I think if they would just give (businesses) more time, maybe give 30 days, maybe that would be better.”

Sweeps going well

The “Sweeps” initiative, which debuted in July , still is going strong, Fabec said. He said officers make rounds at least once a week and cover a ward each month.

“Some of the older residents have disagreements about it, but it's really been effective,” Fabec said.

Older residents who can't address code violations on their own can call the borough building for help, Fabec said.

He said Tarentum has an ordinance that requires snow be cleared from a sidewalk within 24 hours, and there are people who go out and shovel sidewalks for people who can't do it. He said the borough could do the same thing for code violations.

“Just because we give (you) a violation notice doesn't mean that we're going to automatically end up in court,” Fabec said. “If you call me and you're elderly, and you need some time or you need help, we're willing to do that.”

Residents in need of help can call the municipal building at 724-224-1818.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4702, or via Twitter @maddyczebstrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me