ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Brackenridge voters keep Tom Kish as mayor for another 4 years

Madasyn Czebiniak
| Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2017, 9:48 p.m.
Ronald Crawford
Madasyn Czebiniak/Tribune-Review
Ronald Crawford

Brackenridge's mayor is here to stay, at least for another four years.

Incumbent Thomas L. Kish received 253 votes to political newcomer Ronald R. Crawford's 105, according to Allegheny County's unofficial election results. There were five write-ins.

Kish ran as a Democrat. He secured the nomination in the primary with 153 votes. No Republicans appeared on the ballot.

Crawford ran as an independent.

Asked why he thought he was victorious, Kish said: “Past record, probably. It's up to the people. I was there for 12 years.”

Kish, an Allegheny Ludlum retiree, has been mayor for eight years.

Before that, he served as a 3rd Ward councilman for four years.

Kish said his focus will be on public safety and the welfare of his residents.

“I'm just going to continue what I was doing before, that's all,” Kish said. “Like I said: protection of the town, welfare of the people, and work with council on getting some of these roads and that done, and demolition of properties.

“But the main objective is the safety and the welfare of our residents — that's the number one priority to me.”

A mayor's primary responsibility is overseeing the police department.

Brackenridge has four full-time police officers, including Chief Jamie Bock, and two part-time officers.

Kish said he gets along well with them all.

“We got a good police force down there,” he said. “We work together very well.”

Kish said he was grateful to those who got out to vote and showed him support.

“I want to thank all the voters, the people that voted for me,” Kish said. “I'll do the best that I can for the borough.”

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4702 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me