ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Vandergrift spending plan spares taxpayers

Emily Balser
| Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, 12:31 a.m.
Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review

Real estate tax bills for Vandergrift property owners will stay the same next year.

Council passed the $2.7 million budget for 2018 that keeps the tax rate at 28 mills.

The vote on Monday was 6-0, with Councilwoman Christine Wilson absent.

Borough Secretary Steve DelleDonne said there are no major projects slated for next year.

“It's just normal operating stuff,” he said.

The biggest increases from this year are health care and wages, DelleDonne said.

He said health care costs went up by about $15,000 and wages went up between 2 percent and 2.5 percent.

DelleDonne said one mill generates about $22,000 for the borough.

The median assessed value of a house in Vandergrift is about $7,850, according to the Westmoreland County tax office.

The median assessed value of a house is not the same as the market value. Westmoreland County hasn't reassessed properties in more than 40 years.

The state accounts for the disparity between the value of a home and its assessed value through a formula to determine the current assessed value. A house's market value is multiplied by 16.2 percent to determine its assessed value. For example, a home worth $100,000 would be assessed at $16,200, and the millage applied to that.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4680, or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me