ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Allegheny Valley School Board debates merits, costs of out-of-state conferences

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, 8:57 a.m.

The Allegheny Valley School Board was about to get into a debate about the costs and merits of out-of-state conferences when they realized no one on the board wanted to go to one anyway.

The school directors were considering allowing any board member to attend the National School Boards Association's conference and exposition, scheduled for April 7-9 in San Antonio, Texas.

The approximate cost per-person would have been $740 for registration, plus $400 for airfare and $225 per night for lodging, plus meal reimbursement.

Board members Donald Rocco and Elizabeth Moretti raised concerns about the costs and benefits of the junket.

Rocco said that, in theory, all nine school directors could choose to go. He said it wouldn't be worth the district's money and called for placing a limit on how many could attend.

Also citing budget concerns, Moretti said state and local conferences are better, adding that she didn't see the need to send anyone to Texas.

The school directors also began discussing what should be expected of its members returning from such trips, as far as what information they bring back for the rest of the board members.

Newly installed board President Nino Pollino brought the discussion to an end. He asked if anyone was interested in going — to which no one responded.

This is not the first time that conferences have been a point of debate among the school directors.

In September, the board voted 5-4 to send three — Annetta Jursa, Sal Conte and Kathy Haas — to a school leadership event in Hershey in October, even though all three were leaving office in December following this year's election.

The value of their attendance was questioned because they would likely be leaving the board, which they did.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me