ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

PennDOT to host public meeting on Route 28 Highland Park Interchange Reconstruction Project

Madasyn Czebiniak
| Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017, 4:09 p.m.
Commuters sit stuck in traffic along Route 28 north at the Highland Park Bridge interchange on Wednsday, Nov. 8, 2017.
Mary Ann Thomas | Tribune Review
Commuters sit stuck in traffic along Route 28 north at the Highland Park Bridge interchange on Wednsday, Nov. 8, 2017.

A public meeting to provide information on the Route 28 Highland Park Interchange Reconstruction Project will be held Tuesday at Fox Chapel Area High School.

The anticipated $55 million project will address the existing bottleneck and congested traffic flow on Route 28 at the interchange (Exit 6), which has been the site of chronic traffic backups during rush hours and vehicle crashes.

The meeting will be held from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., PennDOT announced.

The project, which is in the preliminary engineering phase, aims to re-establish two travel lanes northbound and southbound between North Canal Street/Kittanning Pike and the Delafield Avenue interchange (Exit 7).

The stretch originally handled two lanes of traffic both north and southbound, but the second lane is painted over with striping in both directions because of numerous accidents between vehicles merging to and from the bridge with traffic on Route 28.

Also proposed is the improvement of acceleration and deceleration ramps at the interchange, and the reconstruction of the Route 28 ramps with the Highland Park Bridge and Freeport Road.

The average daily traffic on the expressway in the area of the interchange is about 57,000.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4702, mczebiniak@tribweb.com or via Twitter @maddyczebstrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me