ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Expert: Guilty verdict would strip ex-Leechburg police Chief Mike Diebold of badge

Matthew Medsger
| Sunday, Jan. 14, 2018, 1:15 a.m.
Leechburg police Chief Mike Diebold (second from right) is escorted to a police car from the Lower Burrell police station.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Leechburg police Chief Mike Diebold (second from right) is escorted to a police car from the Lower Burrell police station.
Leechburg police Chief Mike Diebold's mugshot following his arrest on charges accusing him of being a sexual predator on Jan. 5, 2018.
Westmoreland County Prison
Leechburg police Chief Mike Diebold's mugshot following his arrest on charges accusing him of being a sexual predator on Jan. 5, 2018.

If found guilty of the charges he faces, suspended Leechburg police Chief Mike Diebold will never be a police officer again and faces decades in prison.

That's according to associate professor of law John Rago, a legal expert with Duquesne University's School of Law.

Rago said that if Diebold, who is accused of attempting to have sexual contact with a minor, is found guilty, he faces some very serious penalties.

Diebold is out on bond following his Jan. 5 arrest.

“These are very serious charges and there are serious consequences; there is no question,” Rago said. “Sentencing guidelines provide a sentencing range. It's within the judge's discretion to sentence in those guidelines.”

Duke George, an attorney for Diebold, warned that it is early in the judicial process and it's unknown whether the charges will hold up.

“We have to go through the system,” he said. “This is why we have preliminary hearings, why we have trials and burdens of proof.”

George requests that the public let the case play out.

“I hope everybody respects his right to a jury trial, to jurisprudence, and the presumption of innocence until a jury or a judge makes a verdict,” he said.

“That's all we ask. No more, no less,” George said.

According to state sentencing guidelines, the most serious charge Diebold faces is a first-degree felony count of involuntary deviant sexual intercourse. That carries a maximum sentence of 20 years.

Even if the judge grants Diebold some leniency in sentencing, if he is found guilty, Rago said Diebold will never wear a badge again.

“I'm sure that without regard to any contractual issues, without regard to anything in particular, professional ethics included, I cannot conceive of anyone convicted of such a crime continuing in law enforcement in any capacity,” he said.

Rago stressed that Diebold must be presumed innocent until the case is completed, but he understands that's hard for the public to do.

“When we talk about the presumption of innocence, that's a hard pill to swallow, but this chief is entitled to that presumption,” Rago said. “This is not a happy event for anyone. The blow this does to criminal justice and law enforcement is significant.”

Diebold, 40, of Forks Church Road, Gilpin, was arrested Jan. 5 after arranging to meet with an undercover agent he thought was a teenage girl, according to a statement released by Attorney General Josh Shapiro.

According to Shapiro, Diebold allegedly sent inappropriate pictures to the undercover agent prior to the meeting and solicited the agent for unlawful sexual contact.

Diebold was arrested and charged with unlawful contact with a minor and criminal attempt to commit involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, according to court documents.

Law enforcement ‘conducive' to misconduct

Michael Arter, a former police officer who is now a criminal justice professor at Penn State, said police work is conducive to sexual misconduct and that such misconduct is often unreported.

“Police sexual misconduct is one of the hidden crimes that routinely go unreported for various reasons, such as fear of retaliation or fear they won't be believed or from the sheer humiliation of the acts which took place,” Arter said. “Police work, itself, is highly conducive to sexual misconduct with engagement of both of age and underage females as victims of the offense.

“Police routinely operate alone and are largely free from any direct supervision. This is especially true for a chief.”

Typical cases

Arter said research shows that 40 percent of the victims of police sexual misconduct were teenagers.

Arter said most victims of police sexual misconduct are between 14 and 15 years old and most offending officers are 36 to 43 years old.

As far as why a police officer would engage in this sort of behavior, Arter said the stress of the job is a large contributing factor.

“Police officers react to stress in different ways, with many responses being maladaptive in nature. Such maladaptive reactions include alcohol abuse, promiscuous sexual encounters and risk-taking behaviors.

“Alcohol and sex are often used by police officers to mediate the stress of the job and the associated stress of family life, which often plays a large role in police officer stress,” he said.

Diebold will have a preliminary hearing before Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec at 1 p.m. Friday.

Staff writer Mary Ann Thomas contributed. Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4675, mmedsger@tribweb.com or via Twitter @matthew_medsger.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me