ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Boy, 12, arrested in online threat that closed Apollo-Ridge School District

Emily Balser
| Wednesday, March 7, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

A 12-year-old boy has been arrested in relation to a threat made on social media that closed Apollo-Ridge School District on Monday.

Kiski Township police posted to their Facebook page Wednesday afternoon to inform residents a juvenile had been arrested, but they declined to release a name "due to the age of the actor."

Kiski Township police Sgt. Christian Disciscio said the suspect is a 12-year-old boy.

The police said the arrest was made with the help of the FBI and the Apollo-Ridge School District.

The threat was made via social media. It referenced only Apollo and not specifically the school district, but officials canceled class anyway out of "an abundance of caution."

"It was found that the threat was not directed toward the Apollo-Ridge School District, though it originally appeared so," Disciscio said. "The threat was found to have been directed toward an individual."

Apollo-Ridge resumed classes Tuesday , but with heightened security measures.

Superintendent Matt Curci thanked the police and FBI along with the students, staff and families for their cooperation during the investigation.

"Their cooperation, dedication, and willingness to support one another in difficult circumstances are part of what makes Apollo-Ridge a special place," he said.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4680, or on Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me