ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Two Harrison men charged with ethnic intimidation

Chuck Biedka
| Friday, Aug. 17, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

Two Harrison men are accused of heckling black neighbors along Walnut Street in Natrona with a derogatory name and allegedly pointing a handgun with green laser at them. One of the men is accused of pointing a handgun in a second incident, too.

David Loughner, 69, of Walnut Street is charged with two counts each of ethnic intimidation, terroristic threats, simple assault, and conspiracy for the initial incident police say happened in late June. The charges were filed Aug. 10.

Nathan Pawlowski, 21, of the same address and who police said was Loughner’s grandson, is charged with one count each of ethnic intimidation, terroristic threats and harassment for the June 23 case.

Pawlowski also is charged with ethnic intimidation, terrorist threats and harassment from an incident Wednesday in which police said he was brandishing another handgun.

He is in the Allegheny County Jail in lieu of $10,000 bond for the second case.

In the June case, Pawlowski is accused of hitting one of the neighbors after an argument in which Loughner was punched. According to police, Loughner was punched in the head and fell to the street. He was evaluated by medics and taken to Allegheny Valley Hospital.

Pawlowski told police one of the neighbors threw a bicycle at him before he started to hit the man.

That alleged victim was slammed into a car hood by Pawlowski, police say, damaging the car in the process.

Loughner was given a non-monetary bond pending a preliminary hearing slated for Aug. 22 in the Brackenridge office of District Judge Carolyn Bengel.

Pawlowski is scheduled to attend the same hearing and a second one on Aug. 29.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, cbiedka@tribweb.com or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me