ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Son of Westmoreland County district judge faces more drug charges

Emily Balser
| Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

The 28-year-old son of a Westmoreland County district judge and prominent local attorney was arrested on felony drug charges for the second time in as many months as part of an ongoing investigation by the state Attorney General’s Office.

State police pulled over a white Mercedes-Benz in which Stephen Yakopec III of Lower Burrell was riding Oct. 2 along Route 28 in East Deer, according to court documents.

Court documents said police found a package containing five bags of marijuana and an OxyContin pill in the passenger seat and Yakopec had 25 OxyContin pills on him.

Police and agents with the Attorney General’s Office had been following the car from a High Street home in Freeport where, court documents said, they watched Yakopec pick up the package containing marijuana and place it in the car’s trunk.

Authorities seized the package from the Freeport Post Office on Sept. 24 after being notified that it matched ones seized in a previous arrest, according to court documents.

Authorities said they found 14 pounds of marijuana in a pickup driven by Yakopec during an Aug. 1 traffic stop in Murrysville and, later, found between 7 and 8 pounds of pot at the Lower Burrell home Yakopec shared with girlfriend Kacy T. Anderson, 29. Yakopec and Anderson are scheduled to appear for a preliminary hearing Thursday at District Judge Chris Flanigan’s Greensburg office, but visiting Senior District Judge Herbert Mitchell of Fayette County will handle the case.

Flanigan recused herself and a judge was brought in from outside Westmoreland County because Yakopec’s mother, District Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec, is a district judge in Allegheny Township, according to county Magisterial District Court Administrator Don Heagy.

The package seized during the Oct. 2 traffic stop was addressed to a man at a home on High Street in Freeport, but that man has not been charged, court records show. According to court documents, Yakopec was contacted about picking up the package from a porch at the Freeport home, but they did not say by whom.

A preliminary hearing in the latest case is scheduled for Wednesday at District Judge Carolyn Bengel’s Brackenridge office.

Court records show Yakopec is being represented by Arnold attorney Steve Yakopec Jr., his father. Messages left for Yakopec Jr. and Peck Yakopec were not returned.

According to court documents, the cases involving Yakopec are part of an ongoing investigation of an alleged marijuana distribution operation by the Attorney General’s office that began in March.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, emilybalser@tribweb.com or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me