ShareThis Page
Valley News Dispatch

Allegheny Township wants trails organization to acquire old rail bridge

| Sunday, Nov. 11, 2018, 3:12 p.m.
Tredway Trail
Tredway Trail

Allegheny Township officials want a regional trails organization to take over an old railway bridge spanning the Kiskiminetas River and use it connect the Tredway and Armstrong Trails.

Township Supervisor Rennick Steele said he plans to lobby Westmoreland County officials to have the county join the Erie To Pittsburgh Rail Alliance (EPTA). He hopes that might entice the trail alliance to take over the old railway bridge.

The bridge is owned by the Rosebud Mining Company, which has ceased operations at the mine that the rail line and bridge used to serve, Steele said.

“The next step is to see if the Rosebud coal company is willing to sell it to the Erie To Pittsburgh Trail Alliance,” he said.

The EPTA’s website said the organization is “a coalition of trail organizations, municipalities and individuals dedicated to the promotion, acquisition, development and maintenance of a safe, non-motorized trails network that connects the Bayfront in Erie to the Point in Pittsburgh.”

It includes organizations that maintain or oversee 13 different trails, including the Armstrong Trail in Armstrong County.

Steele said if the alliance acquired the bridge near the confluence of the Kiskiminetas and Allegheny rivers, it would enable the township to extend the Tredway Trail and connect it with the Armstrong Trail in Gilpin.

“The township doesn’t want to own it,” Steele said. “We would prefer that it be owned by a recreational authority.”

Township Manager Greg Primm said owning the bridge would involve unwanted liability issues for the township.

The Tredway Trail runs 2.5 miles from Boggs Way in Lower Burrell’s Braeburn section to Allegheny Township’s Riverforest area.

The Armstrong Trail extends 36 miles along the eastern bank of the Allegheny River from East Brady to Rosston.

Tom Yerace is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me