ShareThis Page

Trump's proposed budget cuts could affect rail service to Pittsburgh, Connellsville

Jacob Tierney
| Tuesday, June 20, 2017, 11:00 p.m.
A biker rides along the Great Allegheny Passage past fall foliage in Ohiopyle State Park. (Trib photo)
Steph Chambers | Trib Total Media
A biker rides along the Great Allegheny Passage past fall foliage in Ohiopyle State Park. (Trib photo)

As the state Senate considers expanding a Western Pennsylvania passenger rail route, the future of another is in question.

President Trump's proposed budget would eliminate federal subsidies for almost all long-distance Amtrak routes, including the Capitol Limited train, which runs from Chicago to Washington, D.C., with stops in Pittsburgh and Connellsville.

The cut would be a major blow to the economy of the small Fayette County community, said Connellsville Mayor Greg Lincoln.

The Capitol Limited is popular with bicyclists on the Great Allegheny Passage, a trail that runs from Pittsburgh to Cumberland, Md., and connects with the C&O Towpath that runs to Washington.

Thanks to the path and bicyclist-friendly train service, Connellsville has become something of a tourism hub. People stop for a meal or a night in a bed and breakfast before moving on to another part of the trail, Lincoln said.

Lincoln said he hopes Congress will protect the Amtrak route, but he's had little indication of lawmakers' intentions since Trump released his budget recommendations in May.

“We haven't heard anything one way or another,” Lincoln said.

He's hopeful the deepest cuts won't make it into the final federal budget.

“It's always doom and gloom when people are talking about budgets,” he said.

Mark Spada, president of Western Pennsylvanians for Passenger Rail, said cutting long-distance lines would have a ripple effect for all passenger trains across the country. In a letter to Congress, Amtrak President C.W. Moorman argued cutting long-distance rail routes would put more of a burden on shorter routes, increasing costs across the network by $423 million a year.

The Trump administration has proposed cutting $630 million a year in Amtrak subsidies, part of a 13 percent overall cut to the Department of Transportation. The president's plan states long-distance trains are often behind schedule and consistently lose money.

Spada said he's optimistic that the cuts won't make it into the final budget Congress passes.

“I don't think that's going to happen,” he said.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me