ShareThis Page

Trump taps Uniontown native, Raytheon executive for Army secretary

| Thursday, July 27, 2017, 6:15 p.m.
Mark Esper, here being inducted into the Laurel Highlands Life Achivement Hall of Fame in 2013, has been tapped by President Donald Trump as a potential nominee for U.S. Army secretary.
File photo
Mark Esper, here being inducted into the Laurel Highlands Life Achivement Hall of Fame in 2013, has been tapped by President Donald Trump as a potential nominee for U.S. Army secretary.

President Trump announced Wednesday night he plans to nominate U.S. Army veteran, Uniontown native and defense contractor executive Mark Esper to be secretary of the Army, after his two previous nominees were withdrawn.

Trump's first pick, Vincent Viola , pulled out of consideration in February when he couldn't untangle his financial interests. The president's second pick, Mark Green , withdrew in May after he was attacked for criticizing federal attempts to protect gay, bisexual and transgender people in workplaces. Esper serves as a lobbyist and vice president for government relations at Raytheon Company, a defense contractor. He also served as a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense from 2002 to 2004. Esper worked on national security issues for multiple senators, and worked on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and House Armed Services Committee. He served in the Army before transitioning to the National Guard and retiring after 21 years of military service.

Esper has degrees from the U.S. Military Academy, Harvard University and George Washington University. He is a 1982 graduate of Laurel Highlands High School.

Trump has had trouble filling cabinet and cabinet-level positions in his administration, with many still vacant six months into his presidency. There are still 120 top positions open, according to The New York Times.

Tribune-Review staff writer Patrick Varine contributed to this report.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me