ShareThis Page

Death of Penn Township man trapped under equipment ruled accidental

Mary Ann Thomas
| Friday, Aug. 11, 2017, 5:42 a.m.
The site where a man was killed after becoming trapped beneath construction equipment in North Huntingdon on Thursday, Aug. 10, 2017.
Patrick Varine | Tribune-Review
The site where a man was killed after becoming trapped beneath construction equipment in North Huntingdon on Thursday, Aug. 10, 2017.

The Westmoreland County coroner ruled that the death of a worker trapped under a piece of heavy equipment in North Huntingdon was accidental.

Timothy Grills, 55, of Penn Township, was working on a piece of construction equipment just before 9 a.m. Thursday at an Aarcon Enterprises storage yard at 4170 Pine Hollow Road.

Painting and other vehicle maintenance is done at the Aarcon site, according to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The company develops construction sites for housing, natural gas well pads and other uses, according to its website.

Grills became trapped when part of the equipment fell to the garage floor, the coroner's office said in a news release.

Deputy Coroner John A. Ackerman pronounced him dead at the scene at 10 a.m. He died of blunt-force injuries, the release said.

OSHA and North Huntingdon Township police are investigating.

Lindsay-Jobe Funeral Home in Penn Township is handling Grills' funeral arrangements.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4691, or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me