ShareThis Page

State police facing civil lawsuit in Westmoreland Co. in trooper's sexual harassment case

Paul Peirce
| Thursday, Oct. 12, 2017, 3:48 p.m.
Trooper Eric D. Zona of the Greensburg barracks of the Pennsylvania State Police.
Trooper Eric D. Zona of the Greensburg barracks of the Pennsylvania State Police.

A former state police dispatcher in Westmoreland County who has a federal sexual harassment lawsuit pending against the agency this week accused troopers of unlawfully retaliating against her when she made the allegations to her superiors two years ago.

Casey E. Bilik, 30, of New Alexandria filed a civil lawsuit in Westmoreland Common Pleas Court that seeks in excess of $60,000 in damages, back wages and legal fees for retaliation by co-workers and troopers at the Kiski station when she made the complaint that she had been harassed by Trooper Eric Zona at the Greensburg barracks.

“Following her complaint of sexual harassment by Zona, Bilik was repeatedly harassed and shunned by state police personnel,” Bilik's attorney, Christine T. Elzer, wrote in the seven-page complaint.

Zona, 46, of North Huntingdon was charged with misdemeanor counts of indecent assault and open lewdness after he allegedly exposed himself to Bilik in October 2015 at the state police merchandise store at the Greensburg barracks. He pleaded not guilty to the criminal charges.

Zona died Oct. 20, 2016, from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. His trial was scheduled to begin two weeks later.

Bilik alleges in the new complaint that after Zona's death, her Kiski supervisor, Sgt. Ryan Maher, instructed on-duty corporals and troopers to escort Bilik to her vehicle when she left at the end of her shift at 11 p.m. because “Maher believed the work environment was so dangerous for Bilik.”

“Various corporals and troopers refused to escort Bilik to her vehicle, claiming she would make false allegations of sexual assault against them if they did so alone,” the complaint states. “Because (state police) acknowledged that Bilik's life was in danger but still refused to protect her, she felt compelled to resign (in January 2017).” Bilik had worked at Kiski since 2013.

As she did in the ongoing federal lawsuit, Bilik alleges that state police should have known of several prior harassment complaints made against Zona that the agency investigated.

“Despite having a zero-tolerance policy with respect to sexual harassment, defendant continued to employ Zona following his violation of the sexual harassment policy,” the lawsuit said.

Bilik alleges that Zona, who had worked at stations in Belle Vernon, Kiski and Greensburg, was transferred multiple times after complaints were made.

“In January 2015, an employee of a bank reported to a trooper that Zona had been asking her on dates and sending her inappropriate text messages. If (state police) had investigated the bank employee's report, it would have learned that Zona sent the employee a text message containing a photograph of his penis,” the lawsuit states.

State police spokesman Cpl. Adam Reed declined comment on the pending litigation.

Elzer said the sexual assault allegations made against Zona in both lawsuits were detailed in state police reports received during the discovery process in the federal lawsuit.

Bilik alleges in her lawsuit that after the criminal case involving her was publicized, 12 other women reported similar misconduct by Zona to District Attorney John Peck's office.

State police in October 2015 filed criminal charges against Zona in relation to an incident involving Bilik at the annex building in the barracks in Hempfield, where she wanted to buy state police merchandise.

The new case filed in Westmoreland tentatively has been assigned to Judge Anthony Marsili.

Elzer said the federal litigation is near the end of the discovery process and attorneys from both sides have a conference Oct. 25 with U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me