ShareThis Page

Jeannette, Ohio men allegedly sold cocaine next to Greensburg police station

Jacob Tierney
| Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017, 11:57 a.m.

Greensburg police seized about $750 worth of crack cocaine from two men who were arrested near the city police station Monday.

Officers charged Corece McKelvin, 34, of Warren, Ohio, and Ted Kilgore, 37, of Jeannette with manufacture, delivery or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance, criminal use of a communications facility, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Police on Monday evening were surveilling the South Main Street parking lot of Family Dollar, located next to the station, because of a report of drug activity, according to an affidavit of probable cause. Officers spotted a suspicious car with an Ohio license plate.

Officers reported smelling marijuana as they approached the car, according to the affidavit. The department's K-9 unit inspected the car and alerted officers of the scent of drugs, the affidavit said.

Officers searched the car and found a bag containing half an ounce of crack cocaine.

McKelvin and Kilgore were arraigned Tuesday and sent to Westmoreland County Prison on $10,000 cash bail each.

Both are scheduled to appear for a preliminary hearing before Senior District Judge James Albert on Nov. 30.

County detectives previously told the Tribune-Review that crack cocaine again is growing in popularity among drug users, particularly those afraid of a fatal overdose.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646, or via Twitter @Soolseem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me