ShareThis Page
Westmoreland

Westmoreland County to sue to recoup millions spent on opioid crisis

Rich Cholodofsky
| Thursday, Nov. 16, 2017, 3:30 p.m.
In an attempt to curb the growing problem of drug abuse, Hampton Township is hosting a roundtable summit to try and combat what is rapidly becoming an epidemic.
In an attempt to curb the growing problem of drug abuse, Hampton Township is hosting a roundtable summit to try and combat what is rapidly becoming an epidemic.

Westmoreland County will join a chorus of other county governments in suing drug manufacturers and doctors over the raging opioid epidemic that has resulted in record overdose deaths and increased public spending.

County commissioners on Thursday hired two law firms to prepare a lawsuit seeking damages to recover millions of tax dollars that officials said have been spent to battle the crisis.

“We're seeking justice for taxpayers,” Commissioner Ted Kopas said.

Marc J. Bern & Partners, a New York-based firm, and Robert Peirce & Associates in Pittsburgh will receive 25 percent of any money the county wins through the lawsuit. No additional expenses will be paid to those firms for their representation.

The lawsuit is being finalized and is expected to be filed as early as Friday, attorney Robert Peirce said.

“We're suing 24 different manufacturers, distributors and doctors,” he said. “It's an opportunity, not a guarantee.”

Westmoreland's damages could go well beyond $19 million, attorney Marc Bern said.

“Ultimately, it could be in the tens of millions of dollars,” he said. “We're expanding the web. Damages are like throwing a pebble into the pond.”

Similar lawsuits recently were filed by commissioners in Armstrong, Beaver, Greene, Lackawanna, Lawrence and Washington counties.

A study released this year by Controller Jeffrey Balzer found Westmoreland County spent $18.8 million last year that was directly attributed to the drug crisis. The costs associated with overdose deaths, as well as other issues involving the prosecution and detention of drug dealers, has cost residents about 23 cents of every tax dollar paid to the county, officials said.

That money was used to pay for criminal justice programs, law enforcement, coroner's expenses and detention costs associated with the epidemic.

County officials said the lawsuit is designed to recoup that money.

“We will still have to do a more thorough assessment of the damages. But the pharmaceutical companies are absolutely responsible for what we are dealing with today,” Kopas said.

Overdose deaths in West­more­land County attributed to opioids and other drugs has risen steadily over the last decade, with new records set each year.

In 2015, overdose deaths topped 126, only to be eclipsed a year later when the coroner's office reported that 174 people died of drug-related causes.

Overdoses in 2017 are again expected to reach a record. Through Nov. 3, the coroner's office confirmed 122 overdose deaths with another 43 suspected cases pending final toxicology reports.

Along with a special task force that is working to educate the public about the perils of drug addiction, county government programs have increased spending to deal with the fallout from the crisis.

Commissioners last year created a special drug court program that has seen a handful of graduates among from its initial 50-person class. County and court officials have said they want to double the size of the drug court program next year, but money to do so has yet to be identified.

“This is just the tip of the iceberg,” Commissioner Charles Anderson said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me