ShareThis Page

Bedford County man convicted of assaulting Arnold teen gets 10-year prison term

Rich Cholodofsky
| Tuesday, Jan. 2, 2018, 5:57 p.m.
Amos Taylor
Amos Taylor

A Bedford County man will serve up to 10 years in prison for sexually assaulting an Arnold teen in her home two years ago.

Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway on Tuesday sentenced Amos J. Taylor, 34, who was convicted in October of sexual assault, indecent assault and corruption of a minor , based on allegations made by the victim, who was 16 years old at the time.

Hathaway ordered Taylor to serve four to 10 years in prison.

During a four-day trial, the victim testified that Taylor improperly touched her, once as they sat together on a sofa and another when he allegedly barged in as she took a shower. She also told jurors that Taylor raped her in an attic bedroom while her parents slept downstairs.

Taylor denied all of the allegations and jurors found him not guilty of the most serious charges he faced — rape and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse.

In court on Tuesday, Taylor declined to make a statement before he was sentenced. Defense attorney John Sweeney said a pending appeal of the convictions prevented Taylor from making a formal apology or expressing remorse for the crimes.

The teen's mother told the judge that she regretted allowing Taylor to move into their home as he dealt with personal issues that included the death of his mother.

“We trusted him at that time. Then we realized the mistake we made in taking him in. And now we're here,” she testified.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me