ShareThis Page

Huntley and Huntley to seek approval for new Penn Township fracking wells

Jacob Tierney
| Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2018, 10:42 p.m.
Above, the Poseidon well pad in Penn Township. The pad is the first fracking well to be undertaken by Huntley & Huntley Energy Exploration of Monroeville.
Submitted photo
Above, the Poseidon well pad in Penn Township. The pad is the first fracking well to be undertaken by Huntley & Huntley Energy Exploration of Monroeville.

Huntley and Huntley Energy Exploration will present plans for its proposed Gaia well pad to the Penn Township Zoning Hearing Board at 7:30 p.m. Thursday, while local anti-fracking group Protect PT plans to continue its fight against wells in the township.

Huntley and Huntley has one operating well in the township — the Poseidon well near Denmark Manor Road, and has proposed two more, including the Gaia pad.

At Thursday's meeting, the company will seek a special land use exception, one of the first steps needed to build the pad and eventually begin drilling.

Protect PT said Dr. Walter Tsou, an expert in public health research and policy, will speak about the negative impacts of fracking wells on health.

Tsou is an adjunct professor, in the Department of Family Medicine & Community Health at the University of Pennsylvania and the interim executive director of Philadelphia Physicians for Social Responsibility.

He authored a resolution passed by the Pennsylvania Medical Society calling for a moratorium on new gas drilling in Pennsylvania.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646,, or via Twitter @Soolseem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me