ShareThis Page

Greensburg man accused of assaulting, restraining woman

Paul Peirce
| Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

Greensburg police allege a 24-year-old city man physically assaulted a woman Wednesday and then refused to let her leave by locking her in a bedroom with her 2-month-old baby.

Cody J. Pelliccione is charged with simple assault, unlawful restraint, strangulation and harassment in the incident that occurred about 9:25 p.m. at a residence in the 900 block of Highland Avenue.

Patrolman William Newmyer said the couple argued and it became physical when Pelliccione refused to allow the victim to leave with her three young children, including the infant.

“(The victim) picked the baby up and ran to the door, but (Pelliccione) locked her inside the bedroom with him. Pelliccione kept telling (the victim) to put the baby down, but she believed he would keep hitting her if she did,” Newmyer said in an affidavit of probable cause filed before District Judge Chris Flanigan.

Newmyer reported that the victim “pulled the curtain off the walls and tried to yell out the window for help.”

Police said the victim eventually left the residence with her children and contacted police. Flanigan ordered Pelliccione held in the county prison after he failed to post $10,000 bond.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me