ShareThis Page

Clerk helped man burglarize Rostraver Township pizza shop, police say

Paul Peirce
| Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

Rostraver Township Police have charged two men for a Jan. 28 burglary at Little Caesars Pizza Shop on Route 51 in which $600 was taken from a safe.

Zachary M. Gonzales, 25, of Belle Vernon, and David P. Vankavelaar, 25, of Rostraver, are charged with planning and committing the burglary, according to court documents filed before District Judge Charles Christner.

Gonzales is charged with burglary, criminal conspiracy, criminal trespass, receiving stolen property and theft while Vankavelaar is charged with four counts of criminal conspiracy.

Officer Richard Beranek II reported in court documents that the pizza shop, located in a Marathon Gas station, had just closed around midnight Jan. 28.

Security video showed that at 12:36 a.m. Vankavelaar, who worked as a clerk there, “left the store open and went to the men's room,” Beranek reported.

At 12:37 a.m., Gonzales entered the building and walked into the pizza shop.

“Gonzales looked around and retrieved the safe key that was hanging in the business. Gonzales wouldn't have known where the safe key was unless he was told...,” Beranek wrote.

Beranek said the video showed Gonzales took the cash from the safe and left at 12:39 a.m.

“Vankavelaar came out of the rest room at 12:41 a.m.,” Beranek wrote.

Beranek said Vankavelaar told him in an interview that he and Gonzales had planned the burglary. However, Beranek said Vankavelaar denied receiving any money from the heist.

“He said he just felt bad for Gonzales' situation and that he had no money,” Beranek wrote.

Preliminary hearings are scheduled March 5 before Christner.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me