ShareThis Page

Saint Vincent to present program on school violence

Joe Napsha
| Thursday, Feb. 15, 2018, 12:39 a.m.
Sarah Daly
Sarah Daly

A Saint Vincent College professor who studies mass shootings and gang violence in schools and examines the effectiveness of safety measures will conduct a symposium on school violence on April 26 at the Unity college.

Sarah E. Daly, assistant professor of criminology, law and society at Saint Vincent, will discuss best practices for understanding and preventing school violence. The symposium is designed for junior and senior high school administrators, teachers, staff, school board directors, legislators and those interested in this critical topic in education.

Daly, a member of the Saint Vincent faculty since 2016, also will present early findings from her research on school employees' attitudes toward school violence during the program, which is scheduled for 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. April 26 at the Fred M. Rogers Center on the campus of Saint Vincent.

The program was planned before the mass shootings at a high school in Parkland, Fla., on Wednesday, in which at least 17 people died and 14 others were wounded after a 19-year-old man opened fire at the school.

Daly is the author of the forthcoming book, “Everyday School Violence.”

She holds a master's degree in criminal justice from Rutgers University-Camden and a doctorate in criminal justice from Rutgers University-Newark.

The program will also include breakout discussion groups, panels and activities to discuss other relevant issues such as intervention techniques, education and policy analysis. Breakfast and lunch will be provided.

The symposium is presented by the college's Department of Criminology, Law and Society. While admission is free, but space is limited. Pre-registration is requested by phoning Sandra Frye at 724-805-2670 or

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me