ShareThis Page
Westmoreland

Saint Vincent professor to testify on school violence

Joe Napsha
| Thursday, March 1, 2018, 3:12 p.m.
Metrocreative

A Saint Vincent College professor whose research focuses on mass shootings and school violence is scheduled to testify Friday before a state Senate education committee's hearing on the subject.

Sarah Daly, assistant professor of criminology, is conducting research on school employees' attitudes toward school violence. She also is writing a book, “Everyday School Violence,” which discusses best practices for understanding and preventing school violence.

Daly's past and current research examines motivational factors among mass shooters and best practices in school violence prevention. She has worked as a consultant to train teachers in conflict resolution and de-escalation strategies.

Daly could not be reached for comment Thursday.

The state Education committee has not proposed a specific bill to deal with school violence, but is looking at alternatives, according to a spokesman for state Sen. John Eichelberger Jr., R-Altoona, who is majority chairman of the education committee.

Mark DiRocco, executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators, said he intends to discuss what the association believes schools should do to in-house to make the facilities safer, such as school security officers and contracting with local law enforcement agencies for security.

A representative of the Pennsylvania State Police also is scheduled to testify.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or jnapsha@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me