ShareThis Page

Westmoreland County judges won't preside over criminal case against Sheriff Jonathan Held

Rich Cholodofsky
| Wednesday, March 7, 2018, 3:12 p.m.
Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held poses for a portrait inside the gun vault at the Westmoreland County Courthouse in Greensburg on Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2018.
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held poses for a portrait inside the gun vault at the Westmoreland County Courthouse in Greensburg on Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2018.

A judge from outside Westmoreland County will oversee the criminal case against Sheriff Jonathan Held.

Common Pleas President Judge Rita Hathaway signed a court order this week recusing all of the county's judges from the case, citing Held's position as a county elected official as the reason.

Held, 43, of Hempfield was charged last week with three public corruption offenses alleging he required his taxpayer-paid staff to perform political functions for his re-election efforts.

Court Administrator Amy DeMatt said Wednesday that she asked the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts to assign a judge from another county to the case. That appointment is pending.

Held's attorney, Ryan Tutera, commended Hathaway's motion.

“Judge Hathaway's decision to recuse the entire bench in Westmoreland County is to be applauded,” Tutera wrote via email, “not only because she got out in front of this issue and spared the taxpayers needless litigation, but also, her decision affords both sides fairness from any potential biases.”

Hathaway's recusal order does not impact next week's preliminary hearing. It will be presided over by Greensburg District Judge Chris Flanigan, DeMatt said.

At that hearing, scheduled for 1:30 p.m. March 15, prosecutors are expected to present testimony from witnesses not identified in initial court documents filed against Held. State agents said fear of retribution by the sheriff prompted them to keep witness identities confidential.

Agents with the Attorney General's office charged Held with two misdemeanor counts of theft and one felony offense of conflict of interest. Agents contend Held ordered sheriff department staffers and deputies to solicit campaign donations and used county equipment such as cars and computers to perform those duties and to coordinate political activity.

Witnesses told investigators that Held had staffers utilize a federal firearms database to identify potential contributors for the sheriff's annual campaign fundraiser that involved target shooting challenges.

Held denies the allegations, and his attorney contends the charges stem from political adversaries seeking to discredit the two-term Republican sheriff.

According to posts on Facebook, Held's supporters plan to hold a rally for the sheriff outside Flanigan's office before next week's preliminary hearing.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me