ShareThis Page

Former Greensburg roommate charged in home invasion

Paul Peirce
| Thursday, March 8, 2018, 3:30 p.m.
A Greensburg police officer leaves the scene of a reporter home invasion on South Euclid Avenue.
Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
A Greensburg police officer leaves the scene of a reporter home invasion on South Euclid Avenue.

A Greensburg man was arrested Thursday on charges of allegedly robbing a former roommate of $300 and a cellphone during a home invasion last week, according to city police.

Derrick F. Douglas, 20, was arraigned on charges of robbery, criminal conspiracy, simple assault, making terroristic threats, theft, receiving stolen property and two counts of unlawful restraint before District Judge Chris Flanigan. He was ordered held in the county prison after failing to post $300,000 bond.

Douglas, who unsuccessfully attempted to conceal his identity, and a second man, who had his face covered with a bandanna, entered an apartment on the 400 block of South Euclid Avenue about 6:40 p.m. March 2 and pointed a gun at a female resident, Patrolman Hank Fontana Jr. alleged in an affidavit of probable cause.

“Douglas grabbed the victim by her shirt, held a gun to her face and pushed her against a wall in the kitchen demanding the $300 that he had observed the victim counting inside the residence earlier,” Fontana wrote.

Police later learned Douglas is the woman's former roommate.

Police reported in court documents that after getting the cash, Douglas grabbed a cellphone out of the hand of a male juvenile who was standing nearby.

“As Douglas and the second male exited the residence ... Douglas stated, ‘I'm taking this, too,'” Fontana quoted witnesses as saying during an interview.

The second suspect has not been arrested. The investigation is ongoing.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me