ShareThis Page

Increasing school safety seen as crucial for Norwin facilities master plan

Joe Napsha
| Monday, March 12, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

Increasing safety and security of Norwin's school buildings — which could include modifying entrances, installing classroom doors and locks, creating places of refuge and security zones and constructing vestibules — should be a critical element of any updated master facilities plan, three architectural firms bidding to do the study told the Norwin School Board on Monday.

“Safety and security is a number one priority,” said Cassandra Renninger, an architect and principal of VEBH of Mt. Lebanon.

The school buildings have to be made safe, but students have to be able to learn and excel in the environment, said Hank Thacik, a principal of Axis Architecture of Monroe­ville.

“We're not designing prisons here,” Thacik said.

“The highest priority is safe and secure schools,” said Super­intendent William Kerr.

All of the entryways to the buildings need to be reviewed and updated, Kerr said.

Norwin's high school was designed before the tragic 1999 school shooting in Columbine, Colo., said Robert Perkins, board president.

When asked whether the updated master plan is a prelude to a building project, Perkins said they will not know until the study is conducted.

Of the three architectural firms that presented proposals to update the district's master facilities plan, Axis submitted the lowest bid at $16,800, plus an additional $1,750 to conduct a study of the district's demographics.

VEBH's fee for the master plan would be $39,500, plus $18,000 for the demographic study and $2,400 for an energy usage review.

HHSDR Inc. of Pittsburgh would charge $49,040 for the master plan, plus $18,000 for the demographic study.

Norwin, however, could contract with another firm to conduct the demographic study, Perkins said. That demographic study would project student enrollment and would take four to six months to complete.

All of the architectural firms would reimburse Norwin part of their fee if the school district proceeds with a “major project,” one that would be worth about $2 million, said Walt Lehman, Norwin's director of facilities and property services.

Noting the difference between the bid from Axis and the two other firms, Kerr said Axis was Norwin's architect for its previous building projects and the firm already knows what is in the buildings.

Norwin initially received proposals from 10 firms seeking to conduct the study, and the field was narrowed to three after initial interviews, Lehman said.

The school board could award a contract for the master facilities plan when it meets March 19. The study is projected to be completed in October or November.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me